仪器网(yiqi.com)欢迎您!

| 注册 登录
网站首页-资讯-专题- 微头条-话题-产品- 品牌库-搜索-供应商- 展会-招标-采购- 社区-知识-技术-资料库-方案-直播- 视频

应用方案

仪器网/ 应用方案/ Comparison of indirect and direct quantification of

立即扫码咨询

联系方式:400-822-6768

联系我们时请说明在仪器网(www.yiqi.com)上看到的!

The presence of fatty acid esters of monochloropropanediol (MEs) in food is a recent concern raiseddue to the carcinogenicity of their hydrolysable moieties 2- and 3-monochloropropanediol (2- and 3-MCPD). Several indirect methods for the quantification of MEs have been developed and are commonly in use until today, however significant discrepancies among analytical results obtained are challenging their reliability. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the trueness of an indirect method by comparing it to a newly developed direct method using palm oil and palm olein as examples. The indirect method was based on ester cleavage under acidic conditions, derivatization of the liberated 2- and 3- MCPD with heptafluorobutyryl imidazole and GCMS determination. The direct method was comprised of two extraction procedures targeting 2-and 3-MCPD mono esters (co-extracting as well glycidyl esters) by the use of double solid phase extraction (SPE), and 2- and 3-MCPD di-esters by the use of silica gel column, respectively. Detection was carried out by liquid chromatography coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry (LCToF-MS). Accurate quantification of the intact compounds was assured by means of matrix matched standard addition on extracts. Analysis of 22 palm oil and 7 palm olein samples (2- plus 3-MCPD contamination ranged from 0.3 to 8.8 g/g) by both methods revealed no significant bias. Both methods were therefore considered as comparable in terms of results; however the indirect method was shown to require less analytical standards, being less tedious and furthermore applicable to all type of different vegetable oils and hence recommended for routine application.

参与评论

全部评论(0条)

获取验证码
我已经阅读并接受《仪器网服务协议》

推荐方案

在线留言

换一张?
取消